Min menu


NATO summit threatens China, at US instigation

 NATO summit threatens China, at US instigation

Members of the NATO 30-nation alliance concluded their summit on Monday with a statement targeting China, saying it poses "systemic challenges" to the military alliance.

The wording of the document marked another important step in the United States' efforts to, in US President Biden's words, "organize the world to face China," as part of a massive escalation of tensions in China. Washington versus Beijing.

NATO summit threatens China, at US instigation
American tanks are unloaded in Antwerp, Belgium, to take part in the Atlantic Resolve military exercises. (AP Photo / Francisco Seco)

The NATO statement, which has 79 paragraphs, mentions China a dozen times, in stark contrast to previous statements. NATO's current strategic document, first published in 2010, does not refer to China, and the 2019 communiqué only mentions the country once.

"The strength of the statement shows how relations between the West and Beijing have deteriorated in the 18 months that have passed since the last meeting of NATO countries," notes the Financial Times . “Today, barely a year and a half later, China is elevated to the rank of a systemic rival,” commented German newspaper Der Speigel .

“China's growing influence and its international policies may present challenges that we must tackle together as an alliance,” the NATO document said. "We will confront China in order to defend the security interests of the alliance."

The statement said China presents "systemic challenges to the rules-based international order," saying China is expanding its military forces and seeking to cooperate with Russia.

Biden's efforts to recruit Washington's allies against China constitute the diplomatic side of America's efforts to strangle China's economic development. He seeks to demonize it in the eyes of the world population and prepare for a military conflict.

On Wednesday, US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin issued a directive declaring China the US military's "number one" target. Foreign Policy commented that the review was intended "to instill in the Pentagon, and indeed the entire US government, the overarching goal of preparing for long-term strategic competition with China."

As Foreign Policy noted : “Even before Biden took office, he consistently presented China's rise to power as the biggest challenge of the century for the United States. Unless the United States regains its competitive and technological advantage, Biden warned, China “will win” ”.

Last week, the US Senate passed the "China Competitiveness Act," a package of $ 250 billion in subsidies and sanctions that the New York Times called "the largest government intervention in industrial policy for decades ”.

The NATO summit followed the G7 meeting held over the weekend which, according to the FT, "criticized China on human rights, trade and the lack of transparency on the origins of the coronavirus pandemic ”.

After the NATO summit, Biden was due to travel to Geneva to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday. Before the summit, Biden said: "What I am going to tell President Putin is that I am not seeking to come into conflict with Russia." Biden described the Russian president as “brilliant”, “tough” and a “tough opponent”.

Ahead of the summit, Biden refused to support Ukraine's admission to NATO, saying, "We can't say at the moment. That remains to be seen… They still have a lot to do on this ”.

Even though the United States demanded more threats against China, the NATO statement remained aggressively oriented against Russia, mentioning it 60 times.

While US allies in NATO accepted their demands for more belligerent language against China in the statement, significant differences remain over Washington's diplomatic offensive against China.

“I don't think anyone around the table today wants to slip into a new cold war with China,” British President Boris Johnson said.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel added that "we must not overestimate" the threat posed by China, she said that "we must find the right balance".

And NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg insisted Beijing "is not an adversary", but said the alliance must "confront China to defend our security interests".

As the German newspaper Der Spiegel commented : “For some NATO members, whose economy is closely linked to that of China, however, this is extremely dangerous - especially for Germany and its economy. export. They therefore wanted to avoid too martial rhetoric against Beijing ”.

As Reuters pointed out:

The allies are watching their economic ties with China. Germany's total trade with China in 2020 was over 212 billion euros ($ 257 billion), according to German government data. China's total holdings of U.S. Treasuries in March 2021 was $ 1.1 trillion, according to U.S. data, and total U.S. trade with China in 2020 was $ 559 billion.

But, despite everything, Der Spiegel said: "The United States and NATO see in China - and this is evident since Biden's appearance at the top - the most dangerous adversary in the long run."

Despite their disagreements and contradictions, the United States and its NATO allies are heading headlong into a major escalation against China, a trajectory with potentially catastrophic consequences.

Despite a raging pandemic, all NATO members are massively developing their armies. Earlier this year, the UK announced a 40 percent expansion of its nuclear arsenal, while the Biden government requested the largest budget from the Pentagon in human history.

The massive military development underway, combined with American threats against China, represents an immense danger to all humanity.

With a frankness that is totally absent from the American press, Russian Ambassador to China Andrey Denisov spoke to the Global Times of China about the consequences of a war between the United States and China.

The Global Times asked Denisov the following question: “The competition and confrontation between China and the United States is intensifying. If one day an armed conflict between China and the United States breaks out, what would Russia's position be? "

Denisov replied that "there is no answer to this question", because "such a conflict would exterminate all mankind, and then it would be useless to take sides".

Tage :

nato was formed in 1949 under the leadership of,geneva summit 2021,nato stands for,biden putin summit,biden putin,when is the nato summit 2021,zeman nato summit,eu us summit,biden nato speech,nato meeting 2021nato china,g7 summit 2021,joe biden,nato summit communique,nato summit declaration

I have ambitions and goals in my life, and I am now trying to achieve them calmly, as the name also came on my channel and website.